logo-newlogo-newlogo-newlogo-new
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books
✕
  • Home
  • Chambers on Internal Audit
  • Internal Audit Stakeholder Relations
  • When an Internal Audit Client Shows You Who They Are – Believe Them!

When an Internal Audit Client Shows You Who They Are – Believe Them!

​​​​‘Good Internal Auditors Ain’t Cheap’ and ‘Cheap Internal Auditors Ain’t (Always) Good’
February 6, 2023
The Perils of Internal Audit as ’Corporate Police’
February 20, 2023
February 13, 2023

Famed American poet Maya Angelou once observed: “When people show you who they are, believe them the first time.” I have always found that to be incredibly sound advice, in both personal and professional relationships. Those words came to mind recently when a chief audit executive (CAE) shared with me an experience with an internal audit client.

The saga started when a new director took over corporate procurement two years ago. The CAE’s staff met with the procurement director at the beginning of an internal audit, and they were warmly received. The director spoke glowingly about the importance of internal audit, and said he looked forward to the assurance they would provide about the effectiveness of procurement operations. Everyone left that meeting feeling good about the path forward.

However, it wasn’t long before the internal audit team began noticing a different level of cooperation and transparency compared with previous audits. It was harder to schedule meetings with procurement officials, and responses to interview questions seemed short and to the point. Gone were the friendly conversations about families and sports team loyalties. There also seemed to be less joy in the office, the CAE told me, and certainly less joy about meeting with the internal auditors.

Something just didn’t feel right, but the audit team was able to acquire access to the records and information they needed, so no there was no confrontation.

Once the audit was completed, the internal audit team held an exit briefing with the new procurement director. They hadn’t identified any major issues, but there were a number of areas identified for improvement. The director was advised that the overall rating would be “satisfactory.” He was polite and thanked the internal audit team for their insights.

Not long after the final audit report was issued, a member of the internal audit team ran into a member of the procurement team at their children’s school function. After some idle conversation about their kids, the internal auditor shared her regret that they hadn’t been able to catch up more during the recent audit. She went on to say: “In fact, it seemed you guys didn’t really want us around.” To her surprise, the procurement team member gave a very unguarded response: “Oh! That’s the new boss. He called us all together at the beginning of the audit and told us to ‘speak to the auditors only when spoken to and to offer only the information the auditors asked for.’ We all felt like we were being watched throughout the audit.”

The internal auditor shared the exchange with her CAE who simply wrote it off as “nerves” of a new director. He figured the procurement director had a bad experience with internal audit in his last job. The CAE was sure things would be better next time. But when the next time came, the script played out exactly the same: a positive opening meeting, a professional but distant environment during the audit, and a curt “thank you” at the conclusion.

Then the CAE shared with me the most disturbing part of the story. He had just learned that the procurement director had been fired for serious procurement policy violations. In fact, the case was being reviewed by the company’s general counsel, who asked for the final internal audit report and workpapers for audits that had been done since the director arrived.

The CAE was disappointed about the entire saga and asked me if I would have handled things differently. I shared that hindsight is always 20/20, and that he certainly shouldn’t second-guess himself. But I offered a few ways he might have approached things differently.

First, I pointed out that, when there is turnover in a key position like the head of procurement, that should be considered in the engagement risk assessment undertaken at the beginning of the new audit. The CAE confided that the team probably hadn’t done that, and had simply reused the audit plan for the procurement area that had been used repeatedly over the years. He acknowledged that was a mistake.

Then, I drew on Maya Angelou’s words and what I had learned a long time ago: “When an audit client shows you who they are – believe them the first time.” I suggested what he likely already understood: There were ample indicators that the director might not be trustworthy. I shared a similar story from my own years in internal audit. I noted that, as internal auditors, we must be objective, but we also must always maintain a healthy level of skepticism. If someone says one thing but does another, my skepticism meter reacts accordingly. My guess is that the procurement director’s two-faced actions were inconsistent with company policies and almost certainly violated the corporate code of conduct.

I also suggested that the CAE might have directly confronted the procurement director after learning that he had told his staff to “answer only the questions asked and to volunteer nothing.” I also likely would have discussed the issue with his boss, the COO. Finally, I would have personally attended the opening meeting of the next procurement audit, and stressed in front of the staff that we were looking for full cooperation during the audit, and asked the director to confirm that was his expectation, too.

I assured the CAE that I still might not have been able to fully anticipate what was to come and the director’s eventual departure. However, I suspect that taking some prudent steps could have given the team a better chance at identifying procurement policy violations.

Before I wrap up this blog, it is important to note that many internal audit clients show us who they are – and quite often, who they are is good. I had many clients who went the extra mile for my audit teams, making sure they had access to every shred of documentation needed, and the clients made sure their staff understood there would be zero tolerance for not cooperating. I believed them, too. I enjoyed a great relationship with the vast majority of my clients, but I always maintained my objectivity and professional skepticism.

The CAE walked away from our conversation hopefully feeling less guilty about how he had handled things, and with a better understanding for how to manage similar situations in the future. By sharing this story, I hope you will be well-prepared the next time a client shows you who they are.

Share

Related posts

July 5, 2022

Winning Over Skeptical Internal Audit Clients: 5 Strategies To Remember


Read more
February 16, 2022

When Friction Erupts: 5 Ways Internal Auditors Can Mend Broken Fences


Read more
November 29, 2021

Internal Audit’s Relationship With the General Counsel Can Be Complicated


Read more

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What’s Trending

03-20-23

New Report Reveals Surprising Insights from Internal Audit Executives


03-13-23

New IIA Report Is a Timely Benchmarking Resource for Internal Auditors


03-02-23

6 Things Audit Committee Members Often Won’t Say to Internal Audit


Read More

Archive

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009

Contact Us

PO Box 1441
New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170

+1-407-463-9389
rchambers@richardchambers.com

About AuditBeacon.com

AuditBeacon.com is a resource center for internal auditors and risk professionals from around the world. In addition to more than 500 blogs authored by Richard Chambers, the site includes links to news and insights on internal audit and other information that illuminates the value of this important profession. AuditBeacon.com is provided as a service by Richard F. Chambers and Associates, LLC.

Copyright © 2023 Richard F. Chambers & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books