logo-newlogo-newlogo-newlogo-new
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books
✕
  • Home
  • Chambers on Internal Audit
  • Internal Auditing Reputation
  • The Perils of Internal Audit as ’Corporate Police’

The Perils of Internal Audit as ’Corporate Police’

When an Internal Audit Client Shows You Who They Are – Believe Them!
February 13, 2023
6 Things Audit Committee Members Often Won’t Say to Internal Audit
March 2, 2023
February 20, 2023

I recently saw a LinkedIn post with a compelling photograph of a smiling police officer and the caption, “Internal Auditors Are Not the Organization’s Police Force.” My first instinct was to agree with the post, but I reflected on the fact that many are seen as playing the role of corporate cop – some by their own choice, some by the choice of management.

Those internal auditors who choose to be “the police” by the way they execute their roles should never complain about relationship struggles they might endure. Choices have consequences.

But as I have observed in my blog over the years, the reality is that many internal auditors are asked to assume responsibilities involving corporate investigations. I am far more sympathetic to these professionals who may have no choice. But the enduring challenge is how to sustain trusting relationships if an internal auditor is frequently called upon to lead or assist in investigating executive and employee misconduct. ​

More than 80 percent of respondents to The IIA’s last Common Body of Knowledge survey indicated that their internal audit function had some degree of responsibility for detecting fraud within their organizations. That number has changed little over the years: An IIA survey last year found that more than half of CAEs said fraud investigations were part of their duties. Another 32 percent said they were responsible for their company’s ethics or whistleblower programs.

Even for those who aren’t permanently assigned investigative roles, it is not uncommon for internal audit to be asked to conduct confidential investigations outside their normal scope of work, such as on behalf of the audit committee or executive management. In some cases, internal auditors are called upon by general counsel or the CEO to assist with specific investigations.

The fallout is that it can be difficult for internal auditors to be seen later as trusted advisors when they return to their normal internal audit role.

To be sure, cross-functional arrangements are not new. When I was a federal inspector general, I was responsible by law for both the audit and investigative functions within my organization. The two groups were very different, with the investigators being federal law enforcement officers. However, because of a shared reporting structure, my audit and investigative roles and those of my staff were inevitably linked in the minds of our stakeholders.

Frequently, I would receive a call from an irate executive exclaiming, “Your auditors are in my department flashing their guns and badges.” I would calmly offer​ assurance that we did not issue weapons or badges to our auditors, and that our investigators were in their department conducting a confidential investigation related to potential fraud or misconduct. The executive would typically calm down, but they never fully differentiated between the roles of our various staff members.

Such misunderstandings might get resolved quickly on a case-by-case basis, but an inherent confusion about the role of the internal auditor versus that of the​ investigator undoubtedly would make it more difficult for internal auditors to build and sustain relationships that are so critical to their ultimate success.

It’s easy to get typecast as wearing either a white hat or a black hat — as hero or enforcement villain. When an internal audit department is associated strongly with the type of investigations that result in terminations or even criminal prosecutions, it can be challenging for anyone in internal audit to be regarded as a true partner, and it’s no wonder they are often seen as the corporate police.

I don’t mean to imply that internal auditors should avoid participating in tough assignments, including investigations involving potential misconduct. Internal auditors can provide a unique and invaluable contribution. And, for smaller organizations, it may not be feasible to maintain separate internal audit and investigation teams. But one of the difficulties of taking on a black-hat role is that it may not be easy to change hats later on.

If your organization decides that internal audit should routinely perform or assist in investigations, you should take the extra steps to ensure your audit–client relationships are healthy. If staff size is sufficient, the simplest action may be to assign separate teams to internal audits and investigations and avoid ​​the temptation to use personnel interchangeably. It also is important to ensure that engagement clients clearly understand the scope and nature of the internal auditors’ work, including the fact that we must occasionally support or conduct sensitive investigations.

As a profession, we have made extraordinary progress in recent decades to raise our stature. Corporate executives and board members have a much more favorable view of our capabilities today. While leading or supporting corporate investigations is a role that we might necessarily assume from time to time, it does not come without risks. And, as with any risk, we must employ the appropriate mitigation strategies.

I welcome your thoughts on internal auditing’s role in supporting or leading corporate investigations.​

Share

Related posts

December 19, 2022

Fines Against Internal Auditors Raise Serious Questions


Read more
October 31, 2022

Internal Auditors: Put Away Your Radar Guns (and focus on traffic safety)


Read more
June 22, 2022

Everybody Loves a Government Watchdog … Until It Barks


Read more

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What’s Trending

03-20-23

New Report Reveals Surprising Insights from Internal Audit Executives


03-13-23

New IIA Report Is a Timely Benchmarking Resource for Internal Auditors


03-02-23

6 Things Audit Committee Members Often Won’t Say to Internal Audit


Read More

Archive

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009

Contact Us

PO Box 1441
New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170

+1-407-463-9389
rchambers@richardchambers.com

About AuditBeacon.com

AuditBeacon.com is a resource center for internal auditors and risk professionals from around the world. In addition to more than 500 blogs authored by Richard Chambers, the site includes links to news and insights on internal audit and other information that illuminates the value of this important profession. AuditBeacon.com is provided as a service by Richard F. Chambers and Associates, LLC.

Copyright © 2023 Richard F. Chambers & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books