logo-newlogo-newlogo-newlogo-new
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books
✕
  • Home
  • Chambers on Internal Audit
  • Uncategorized
  • Internal Auditors Know That Smart People Can Do Dumb Things

Internal Auditors Know That Smart People Can Do Dumb Things

6 Strategies for Generating a “Big Impact” With a Small Internal Audit Staff
August 29, 2022
Recession Clouds Are Forming – What Should Internal Audit Do To Get Ready?
September 15, 2022
September 9, 2022

I recently shared a blog that proved very popular with the profession. Internal Auditors Must Remember: Good People Can Do Bad Things resonated with readers around the world who are constantly seeking to reconcile a person’s character with potential misdeeds. While it is true that good people can do bad things, it is likewise true that smart/capable people can do dumb things.

We don’t have to look far to identify instances in which decisions destroyed shareholder value in a company or the hard-earned reputation of a government agency. Such blunders are often made by incredibly seasoned professionals who get careless or exercise poor judgement.

It’s also easy to be intimidated when auditing an area led or filled with intelligent, seasoned professionals. They dazzle you with their deep understanding of operations; their knowledge can appear unassailable. Yet, I have found that some very bright folks can do some pretty dumb things. For example, I have uncovered deliberate violations of internal controls where individuals believed such controls were unnecessary for them

In government, I was called upon by legislators and others to audit or investigate allegations of waste and mismanagement. Our efforts often confirmed that capable executives had made bad decisions, costing taxpayers millions of dollars. The root cause was usually that egos had blinded people to their own fallibility. They weren’t nearly as smart as they thought they were.

So, how do internal auditors effectively audit areas led by highly capable and expert executives? It takes a lot of courage, a lot of self-confidence – and a healthy dose of skepticism. Objectivity demands that we remain skeptical – no matter how impressive someone’s resume or track record might be. For internal auditors, being skeptical is a never-ending chore.

New internal auditors tend to see the world in black-and-white: “Should we do an audit?” “Should we issue a finding?” “Am I maintaining a healthy degree of professional skepticism?” For many, such questions point to a single yes-or-no answer. But with experience, an internal auditor comes to realize that the answers to those kinds of questions are nuanced. The issue is not merely whether we should perform an audit, but whether risks in the program, function, or activity warrant an audit compared with other areas where the risk may be greater; whether sufficient resources are available; and how soon the audit is needed. And it’s not just reporting a finding, but reporting the finding’s significance relative to other areas in the audit, and how strongly to frame it.

The same thing applies when we attempt to draw a line between a healthy amount of professional skepticism and unwarranted suspicions about the people and areas we audit. Professional skepticism means taking nothing for granted: We continuously assess audit evidence and other information, and we question what we see and hear. We take pride in never missing a clue or warning sign, remaining alert for hidden messages. It is a quality that is essential to our work as auditors.

The flip side is that too much skepticism can hamper an internal audit’s effectiveness. I once had a hyper-suspicious auditor on my team who always assumed his clients were guilty of something and that his primary job was to blow the whistle on them. Not surprisingly, his working relationship with management and even with me deteriorated. Managers became less than forthcoming during risk assessments and audit engagements, leading to a breakdown in communication and weaker audits.

An internal auditor’s performance goals may include initiatives to build working relationships with key stakeholders and foster business partnerships with management. Unfortunately, the need for professional skepticism means we can never completely trust the very people in our organization who want us to be their partner. And that means management is less likely to think of internal auditors as trusted advisors, especially when compared with their “partners” in other departments.

Finding an appropriate level of professional skepticism and knowing how to express it are critical to an internal auditor’s long-term success. One size does not fit all: Some internal auditors rely on building relationships, while others are inclined to dig out the truth in the form of hard facts. The trick is balance, and to exhibit just the right degree of skepticism in any given situation.

If only we had a standardized rating system for determining our level of skepticism! Unfortunately, accurate and flexible ratings are not likely anytime soon. Imagine a checklist with statements such as: “The client seemed nervous and was sweating profusely. Add three skepticism points.” Or, “The sample size was statistically significant. Deduct one skepticism point.”

For me, the secret is to approach each situation with an open mind and to communicate in a way that demonstrates underlying trust and confidence in management. I still need to ask tough questions, but I will use tact in deciding when and how to ask them.

“Trust but verify” was a signature phrase of U.S. President Ronald Reagan when discussing superpower relations with the former Soviet Union. For internal auditors, “trust but verify” should be words to live by. We need to demonstrate trust in others (no matter how smart they seem), and continually verify that our trust is well-placed.

Share

Related posts

January 31, 2023

Recent Advice on Hiring Internal Auditor’s You Can ‘Trust’ Is Misdirected


Read more
January 24, 2023

Do Performance Bonuses Impair Internal Auditors’ Independence and Objectivity?


Read more
January 16, 2023

Are Internal Auditors to Blame When Boards Are in the Dark?


Read more

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What’s Trending

01-31-23

Recent Advice on Hiring Internal Auditor’s You Can ‘Trust’ Is Misdirected


01-24-23

Do Performance Bonuses Impair Internal Auditors’ Independence and Objectivity?


01-16-23

Are Internal Auditors to Blame When Boards Are in the Dark?


Read More

Archive

  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009

Contact Us

PO Box 1441
New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170

+1-407-463-9389
rchambers@richardchambers.com

About AuditBeacon.com

AuditBeacon.com is a resource center for internal auditors and risk professionals from around the world. In addition to more than 500 blogs authored by Richard Chambers, the site includes links to news and insights on internal audit and other information that illuminates the value of this important profession. AuditBeacon.com is provided as a service by Richard F. Chambers and Associates, LLC.

Copyright © 2023 Richard F. Chambers & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books