logo-newlogo-newlogo-newlogo-new
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books
✕
  • Home
  • Chambers on Internal Audit
  • Uncategorized
  • The Talent Disruption Risk Looming in 2021

The Talent Disruption Risk Looming in 2021

​Is GE’s Rotational Audit Announcement Good News or Bad?
November 15, 2020
What My 10 Most-read Blog Posts of 2020 Say About Internal Auditors
December 13, 2020
November 22, 2020

The-Talent-Disruption-Risk-Looming-in-2021

As internal auditors put the finishing touches on their risk assessments before preparing their 2021 audit plans, there is one risk that should not be overlooked: talent disruption. While there has been some degree of challenges in organizations’ talent pools for years, I believe a perfect storm is coming that will create more pervasive talent disruption risks in 2021 than any time in memory. 

There has been plenty of speculation about how businesses will operate in a post-COVID-19 world, including short- and long-term changes to managing talent. While no amount of speculation or crystal-ball gazing can provide definitive answers to how these issues will manifest, one thing is certain: Talented executives and staff are becoming restless and are gazing beyond the confines of their employers for new opportunities.

There are plenty of studies that point to a significant percentage of employees — as high as a third — questioning the wisdom of returning to the workplace. Others speculate about how work-from-home will change recruiting, salaries, and other compensation. Still others question the impact on workplace culture, team chemistry, and how technology could mitigate or alter any disadvantage of not being physically present to network and build alliances.

Earlier this year, EY gathered a group of 100 senior professionals from around the world to examine the impact of COVID-19 and identify steps that business leaders need to build into their thinking about the future. Part of that discussion focused on talent. Those sessions identified several trends that point to significant talent disruption. For example:

  • Most participants believe remote work isn’t going away. Not only do many employees prefer working from home, employers have discovered that they can effectively manage remote teams with little impact on productivity. This has clear repercussions for “delinking” talent from place.
  • Organizations will need to rethink how to attract, develop, and inspire remote workers. This will require fundamental changes to human resources policies and practices from onboarding to promotion to succession planning.
  • Global talent recruitment to achieve specific projects and goals could lead to fewer permanent employees. This could accelerate acceptance of “gig” work economic models, in which temporary employees or independent contractors do the lion’s share of the work for a number of employers.

The EY brain trust also addressed the pandemic’s influence on two trends that could accelerate changes to business models: digital transformation and the corporate shift to long-term value. From Beyond COVID-19: Will You Define the New Normal or Watch It Unfold?:

“With virtual and digital replacing physical wherever possible, adoption of automation, AI, and AR/VR will surge, participants predicted. The ability to deploy computing power, bandwidth, the cloud, and cybersecurity will define winners. Success will depend on continuous business model innovation with agile, open collaboration.

“At the same time, several participants observe that the pandemic has put human welfare and sustainability front and center. Consumers see a new role of companies for good and will value companies demonstrating a long-term value agenda in culture, purpose, and ethics.”

An even more fundamental change in business models is examined in 9 Future of Work Trends Post-COVID-19 from Gartner. A 2019 survey by the global research company found 55% of organizational redesigns focused on increasing efficiency by streamlining roles, supply chains, and workflows. The pandemic has shown that, while this approach can increase efficiency, it offers little flexibility to respond to disruption.

Just a year later, business leaders are gravitating to business models that stress responsiveness by avoiding rigid structures, embracing agility, and providing employees with varied, adaptive, and flexible roles that also promote cross-functional knowledge and training.

Another consideration is demographic dynamics to the post-COVID-19 work environment. For example, research by ManpowerGroup exposed significant variations by generation and gender. A recent survey by the firm found:

  • Generation Z is most keen to return to the workplace to develop their careers and socialize (51%), while millennials are least positive (38%).
  • Generation X values being in the workplace to concentrate and collaborate away from household responsibilities. Boomers, meanwhile, choose socializing and collaborating with colleagues (34%) as a top reason to return.
  • Almost half of men (46%) feel positive about returning; only one-third of women (35%) feel the same. 
  • Men with children list spending time with their family as a top benefit to working remotely.
  • Women feel more negatively about going back to work, increasing in concern the younger the children — 61% for children up to 5 years old, 53% for ages 6-17, and 50% for those 18 and over.

Significantly, the ManpowerGroup report reflects fundamental changes in the way employees think about the workplace, with 43% agreeing that the pandemic marks the end of full-time work in the office and 80% desiring more remote work to support a work-life balance.

A final consideration is one that hits close to home with me: The work-from-home experience has provided many a glimpse into an alternate lifestyle. This forced experiment, while uncomfortable at first, has generated new insights for many about priorities and relationships. 

Indeed, I expect that I will always look back on 2020 as the year when the isolation created by COVID-19’s shelter-in-place dynamic changed my life. It effectively interrupted a busy schedule of nearly nonstop travel that dominated my existence over much of the past 10 years. This dramatic reinvention of my professional persona — from a globetrotting spokesman for the profession I love, to a homebound business executive — likely accelerated my decision to pass the torch to a new CEO for The IIA at the end of March 2021.

Clearly, I am not alone. The global health crisis has fundamentally changed how we work, play, and, for many, see our futures. This portends a fundamental change to the employment contract and a dramatic talent disruptionfor organizations. Risk professionals must be prepared to not only understand and manage this emerging risk, but to exploit it, as well. Internal auditors certainly should not manage this risk for their enterprise. However, it should be on the radar for potential assurance to management and the board that it has been identified and is being effectively managed.

As always, I look forward to your comments.

Share

Related posts

January 31, 2023

Recent Advice on Hiring Internal Auditor’s You Can ‘Trust’ Is Misdirected


Read more
January 24, 2023

Do Performance Bonuses Impair Internal Auditors’ Independence and Objectivity?


Read more
January 16, 2023

Are Internal Auditors to Blame When Boards Are in the Dark?


Read more

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What’s Trending

01-31-23

Recent Advice on Hiring Internal Auditor’s You Can ‘Trust’ Is Misdirected


01-24-23

Do Performance Bonuses Impair Internal Auditors’ Independence and Objectivity?


01-16-23

Are Internal Auditors to Blame When Boards Are in the Dark?


Read More

Archive

  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009

Contact Us

PO Box 1441
New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170

+1-407-463-9389
rchambers@richardchambers.com

About AuditBeacon.com

AuditBeacon.com is a resource center for internal auditors and risk professionals from around the world. In addition to more than 500 blogs authored by Richard Chambers, the site includes links to news and insights on internal audit and other information that illuminates the value of this important profession. AuditBeacon.com is provided as a service by Richard F. Chambers and Associates, LLC.

Copyright © 2023 Richard F. Chambers & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books