logo-newlogo-newlogo-newlogo-new
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books
✕
  • Home
  • Chambers on Internal Audit
  • Uncategorized
  • Making Auditors “Civil Servants” Isn’t the Right Answer

Making Auditors “Civil Servants” Isn’t the Right Answer

Call for Nominations: Internal Audit Beacon Awards
November 12, 2021
When There is No Internal Audit – Investors Should Run!
November 22, 2021
November 15, 2021

From time to time, I hear of ideas for “improving” the auditing profession. Some are pretty good, but others catch me totally by surprise and, well, leave me cringing.

That’s the case over a recent interview with the CEO of IIA South Africa in CFO South Africa on the future of audit. In the article, “’Are these the auditors we want?’ asks Julius Mojapelo,” Julius floats two broad proposals for discussion:

  1. The external audit profession should be organized as a “civil service.”
  2. There should be greater regulation of the internal audit profession.

Julius is a friend for whom I have great respect. I believe he correctly assesses the scope of the crisis over confidence in capital markets (and, by extension, external auditors) brought on by far too many greedy and unethical corporate business leaders. According to the article, “Julius says South Africa needs a better class of businessperson who believes in conscious capitalism, and a better class of politician with good principles and a commitment to the greater good.” It is hard to argue with that assessment, which often extends beyond the borders of South Africa and includes many so-called “developed economies,” as well.

Knowing Julius, I am confident that his proposals are well-intended, and I respect anyone who brings forward thoughtful ideas to address societal challenges. But, I fear his proposals would not cure the root cause of financial reporting and other fraudulent activities that have brought down some iconic companies in South Africa and other countries in recent years. In fact, I fear his suggestions could create unintended consequences that would make audit even less effective and reliable and lead to further problems.

Here are my thoughts on each of the broad proposals floated in the article:

The (external) audit profession as a “civil service.”

Julius introduces this proposal by saying, “I believe there is a need to reconsider whether assurance should ever be a business.” He continues, “I think the question is whether they should be a business, or a civil service.” According to the article, Julius “stresses that he views civil service as less about being employed by the public sector than as a mindset.”

The idea is intriguing, but flawed. It appears predicated on the notion that auditors are too easily swayed by profits and should be treated differently from the world’s other great professions (medicine, law, engineering, etc). Each of those professions are regulated, but they aren’t typically considered part of a “civil service.” A civil service model for auditors would stifle the flow of talent into the profession, and potentially undermine the intent to enhance audit quality. Having spent 26 years of my career in a civil service role, I am very cognizant of the tendency for bureaucracy to overtake intended missions, and the frustrations that talented civil servants feel over the lack of investment and innovation that too often befalls public agencies.

Instead of a civil service model for the external audit profession, I would advocate stronger government regulation similar to what has proliferated over the past 20 years. Government regulatory bodies, such as the PCAOB in the United States and IRBA in South Africa, have been established/strengthened in countries around the world. Independent establishment of audit standards, inspections of audits, and disciplinary actions over misconduct are more apt to cure any ills than would simply making the auditors civil servants.

I also believe that strong malpractice liability for external audit partners and their firms would better promote higher quality audits than reassigning them to a civil service with a presumable exemption from malpractice.

Regulation of the internal audit profession.

Julius advocates for greater regulation of internal auditors, saying, “There are many organizations where internal audit is still an option, and it’s not being done according to the internal audit standards. To me, internal audit is the one that needs the most improvement at this point.” He supports legislation that would mandate (1) that only “registered” internal auditors be able to sign off on internal audit reports, and (2) the standards to which internal audit work should be performed.

I have long held the position (which I believe is still shared by The IIA) that government regulation of the internal audit profession would be a bad idea. A well-resourced independent internal audit function is a vital component of a company’s system of risk management and controls. The long arm of government has no place regulating how corporate sector management and boards obtain assurance on the effectiveness of risk management and controls. Based on my experience, once the tentacles of government are introduced into the private sector, they tend to become pervasive. There are better ways to enhance the quality of internal audit.

For example, I have long advocated that publicly traded companies be required to have an internal audit function, or explain why they don’t. I would even support provisions by listing exchanges and securities commissions that companies disclose the annual budget for their internal audit function and any changes in the chief audit executive role. I believe that would inform investors on the company’s commitment to independent internal audit assurance.

It is important to remember that The IIA has long been committed to ethical conduct in the profession. The IIA’s Code of Ethics are clear on the responsibilities of internal auditors to be ethical in the execution of their responsibilities – including the provision that internal auditors “shall perform internal audit services in accordance with the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing.” In other words, it is unethical for internal auditors to undertake work that is not in accordance with the Standards.

What is needed is not government-endorsed standards, but greater adherence by the profession to its own Code of Ethics and Standards. The mechanisms are in place to enhance the quality of internal audit. We must embrace them before governments step in. As a profession, I believe we are up to the challenge.

In closing, I want to reemphasize my respect for Julius and his ideas. While I may not agree with his proposed solutions, I respect his right to offer them for discussion and debate. The article closes by noting:

“Julius believes it (promoting a better class of business person) begins with education at school level, and teaching children and youth to be active citizens.

“He supports the Youth Citizen Action Programme (in South Africa), which provides scholars in Grade 6, 7, 9 and 10, in all nine provinces, the opportunity to drive positive social, environmental and academic change while becoming active and responsible citizens.

“Our kids are ready to fix this country,” he says. “They just need a space to do it.”

That is a sentiment with which we can all agree. Thank you, Julius, for supporting such a worthy cause.

Share

Related posts

January 31, 2023

Recent Advice on Hiring Internal Auditor’s You Can ‘Trust’ Is Misdirected


Read more
January 24, 2023

Do Performance Bonuses Impair Internal Auditors’ Independence and Objectivity?


Read more
January 16, 2023

Are Internal Auditors to Blame When Boards Are in the Dark?


Read more

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What’s Trending

01-31-23

Recent Advice on Hiring Internal Auditor’s You Can ‘Trust’ Is Misdirected


01-24-23

Do Performance Bonuses Impair Internal Auditors’ Independence and Objectivity?


01-16-23

Are Internal Auditors to Blame When Boards Are in the Dark?


Read More

Archive

  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009

Contact Us

PO Box 1441
New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170

+1-407-463-9389
rchambers@richardchambers.com

About AuditBeacon.com

AuditBeacon.com is a resource center for internal auditors and risk professionals from around the world. In addition to more than 500 blogs authored by Richard Chambers, the site includes links to news and insights on internal audit and other information that illuminates the value of this important profession. AuditBeacon.com is provided as a service by Richard F. Chambers and Associates, LLC.

Copyright © 2023 Richard F. Chambers & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books