logo-newlogo-newlogo-newlogo-new
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books
✕
  • Home
  • Chambers on Internal Audit
  • Internal Audit Stakeholder Relations
  • Internal Audit’s Relationship With the General Counsel Can Be Complicated

Internal Audit’s Relationship With the General Counsel Can Be Complicated

When There is No Internal Audit – Investors Should Run!
November 22, 2021
The IIA at 80: A Legacy of Leadership, Collaboration, and Advocacy
December 6, 2021
November 29, 2021

As a newly appointed chief audit executive many years ago, I tried early to identify the other executives in the organization who would be our strongest allies. I reported to the CEO, but quickly established a strong rapport with the COO, CFO and the general counsel (the chief legal officer). I felt they all supported our mission and were champions for the work we did. Then, suddenly, I locked horns with one of them, and the relationship was in serious disarray.

During the course of an audit. one of my audit teams discovered a potential legal violation in the use of government funds for a construction project. Responsible management officials were adamant that they had done everything correctly, and they even obtained a legal opinion prior to construction. Nevertheless, I promptly reported the audit finding to the CEO, who was alarmed at the potential consequences. The next day, I received a call from the general counsel, telling me that the CEO had asked him to investigate the issue. Without hesitation, I asked how he could objectively review something that his attorneys had signed off on? He nodded and sheepishly acknowledged that I had made a good point.

During my next update with the CEO, he mentioned that the general counsel had told him of my objection to the internal legal staff’s further involvement. The CEO indicated that an outside counsel would now be retained to undertake the investigation. But then he said something I didn’t expect: “Richard, you should never challenge the general counsel. He is always on your side, and will do what is right for the organization.” I heard what the CEO said, but I wasn’t so sure whose side the general counsel was really on when the chips were on the table.

Fast forward 25 years, and this is still a topic that comes up often during internal audit roundtable discussions, and there is no shortage of opinions. Too often, CAEs express frustration with general counsels who, they believe, are more concerned about reputational and legal risks than in affording internal audit the opportunity to fully articulate results of its work.

To be sure, reputational and legal risks are important. However, general counsels too often prefer to eliminate those risks altogether in internal audit reports — in effect, silencing internal audit from sharing critical information with the board or audit committee.

Over the years, I have learned of heavy-handed actions by a number of corporate attorneys — for example, how internal auditors were persuaded to inappropriately refrain from characterizing certain foreign expenses as U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violations. The argument most often advanced is that the expenses in question are legal “facilitation payments.” Faced with intimidating legal expertise, internal auditors often fold their hands, leaving potentially critical information concealed.

As Robert Mundheim (former Dean of the University of Pennsylvania Law School) noted several years ago, “The general counsel is supposed to provide advice on the legal environment and legal responsibilities.” Mundheim also correctly points out, “General counsel’s role as a partner to senior management does create tensions. General counsel must retain the ability to make clear-eyed professional judgments and to have the backbone to raise issues with the appropriate decision-maker if, for example, the proposed course of action raises issues of compliance with the law.”

By no means am I suggesting that the CAE should disregard the advice of general counsel. Rather, I believe we must be cautious in accepting general counsel’s guidance as infallible. When it comes to the CAE’s relationship with general counsel, I suggest that it be guided by at least five principles:

  • Mutual trust that each party is acting in the best interest of the organization.
  • Respect for the respective roles of each party and the prism through which each views risks.
  • Communication on a continuous basis to foster effective risk management, internal controls, and corporate governance.
  • Collaboration to ensure risks are effectively managed and internal controls are effectively designed and implemented throughout the organization.
  • Recognition of the right of each party to agree to disagree, when warranted.

That last principle should be rarely needed, but when it is, both parties should agree that the audit committee of the board must be apprised and, when appropriate, it should arbitrate the points of disagreement. The principle is intended to allow each party to makes it argument when seeing things from a fundamentally different point of view.

Back to the original question: “Is the general counsel friend or foe?” It certainly would be counterproductive for an organization if the answer is foe. However, it is unrealistic to assume that general counsel will always agree with internal audit. Instead, I characterize the best relationship as one of “professional colleagues.” The general counsel should be internal audit’s advocate, not its adversary.

My own journey with the general counsel in my company did have a happy ending. After the awkward encounter over the contract legal advice, we mutually worked to rebuild trust. He later admitted that he was more embarrassed than angry that I called out his objectivity. We went on to tackle other complicated legal issues that arose from our audit reports, and remained good friends even after I left the organization.

I welcome your thoughts.

Share

Related posts

February 13, 2023

When an Internal Audit Client Shows You Who They Are – Believe Them!


Read more
July 5, 2022

Winning Over Skeptical Internal Audit Clients: 5 Strategies To Remember


Read more
February 16, 2022

When Friction Erupts: 5 Ways Internal Auditors Can Mend Broken Fences


Read more

3 Comments

  1. Adel Rahmani says:
    November 29, 2021 at 10:57 pm

    Many thanks for the article.
    In some organisations, General counsel is also covering Compliance topics (mainly in regulated sectors) and this pushes him to be more a real second line than a « support function »
    Hence, as second line, his work is more than never subject to a third line indépendant opinion …

    Reply
  2. Daniel Nyaga says:
    November 30, 2021 at 5:54 am

    The uniqueness of IA work,you appraise people in the own areas of expertise.

    Reply
  3. Ram says:
    December 5, 2021 at 12:47 pm

    Respected Sir
    Many listed companies choose to employ outsourced legal service providers and avoid the requisite legal compliance on the ground of confidentiality of inside information. Thus, complete legal review on timely basis iz circumvented and level of litigation keeps on mounting and unresolved litigated debts pile up, provided and not written off to claim tax benefits. Though there is strong regulatory requirements for complete legal review of Board’s minutes, effectiveness of controls and systems, the same is bypassed. Internal Audit is handicapped as Board committee and key management have upper hands

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What’s Trending

03-20-23

New Report Reveals Surprising Insights from Internal Audit Executives


03-13-23

New IIA Report Is a Timely Benchmarking Resource for Internal Auditors


03-02-23

6 Things Audit Committee Members Often Won’t Say to Internal Audit


Read More

Archive

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009

Contact Us

PO Box 1441
New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170

+1-407-463-9389
rchambers@richardchambers.com

About AuditBeacon.com

AuditBeacon.com is a resource center for internal auditors and risk professionals from around the world. In addition to more than 500 blogs authored by Richard Chambers, the site includes links to news and insights on internal audit and other information that illuminates the value of this important profession. AuditBeacon.com is provided as a service by Richard F. Chambers and Associates, LLC.

Copyright © 2023 Richard F. Chambers & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books