logo-newlogo-newlogo-newlogo-new
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books
✕
  • Home
  • Chambers on Internal Audit
  • Uncategorized
  • Internal Audit Quality: Coping With Snails and Rabbits

Internal Audit Quality: Coping With Snails and Rabbits

Navigating the New Internal Audit Talent Shortage: Strategies for Success
April 20, 2015
​​Enduring Awareness of Internal Audit’s Value Takes More Than a Month
May 4, 2015
April 28, 2015

Occasionally, it helps to take a light-hearted look at a serious topic. I have been speaking and writing about the imperative of internal audit timeliness for more than two decades. I even dedicated three chapters of my book, Lessons Learned on the Audit Trail, to this enduring challenge. As I often note, even the most carefully planned and meticulously conducted audit will serve no value if the results are delivered too late to make a difference. At the same time, I have been cautioning about audit processes that result in untimely audit results, I have also cautioned about the dangers of auditing too quickly. I have referred to these as “drive-by audits.”

While carefully crafted internal audit policies can mitigate the risks of audits that are undertaken too slowly or audits that are conducted at a reckless pace, there is another variable that often circumvents the best crafted policies — the tendencies and personal characteristics of some internal auditors. Those who are overly cautious and meticulous to a fault will often deliver internal audit results that take too long. Those who are impatient and have a difficult time focusing are often the ones who rush to judgment. I call these personality types the snails and the rabbits, respectively.

If you have been an internal auditor long enough, you are bound to have teamed up with a snail along the way. As the team leader, you have assigned key portions of the internal audit plan to members of the team, only to discover that the rest of the team is waiting at the finish line while the last piece of the audit is being polished off by the team’s slowest member. Conversely, a CAE’s worst nightmares can often be the rabbits on your staff. They will cheerfully bring you a draft internal audit report in record time. However, the problem will often be that insufficient evidence was gathered to support the results.

The dangers of snail-paced internal auditing can extend well beyond completion of the engagement. Because they can slow down the entire audit process, it may be necessary to reduce, postpone, or cancel other planned engagements. Client satisfaction plummets as audits stretch on without visible results.

By contrast, the dangers of rabbit-paced internal audits are the risks they present to internal audit’s credibility. Audit’s that are conducted at the speed of sound run a greater risk of containing inaccurate results, or missing something that presents an ongoing risk. The rabbits often rely on canned programs or checklists to perform quick audits, which can fail to get to the heart of the most significant risks within the processes under review. These internal auditors may get their reports out early, but they are more likely to contain errors or serious omissions than those issued by the snails.

Fast or slow, the impact on quality can be significant. That’s why every internal audit department needs to have control mechanisms in place to mitigate the potential dangers of snails and rabbits. These include sound internal audit policies and minimum documentation standards required for all engagements. But even the best policies and procedures may not be enough.

Supervisory reviews of audit plans can help to keep processes in check, assuming those reviews take place before any damage is done. Unfortunately, supervisory reviews too often take place after the fact. For example, we all know of instances in which audit programs were not approved until after fieldwork was underway. And if supervisory reviews are not completed until the end of an engagement, errors or omissions made by a mistake-prone rabbit might necessitate extending the engagement or sending in a new engagement team.

Supervisory reviews also are important on the other end of the spectrum. Slower, more deliberative internal auditors may need feedback to ensure valuable time is not spent on unimportant issues.

It’s a dilemma worth of our attention. Internal auditors must be capable of auditing at the speed of risk; in the current environment, that speed is sometimes very fast. We also must be capable of providing reliable assurance about risks and controls. It’s a balancing act that can be difficult at times. But only by avoiding the dangers related to speed — too fast or too slow — can we ensure that our work is accurate, complete, and timely.

Share

Related posts

March 13, 2023

New IIA Report Is a Timely Benchmarking Resource for Internal Auditors


Read more
May 16, 2022

THE STAGGERING TOLL OF COVID RELIEF FRAUD: WHERE WERE THE THREE LINES?


Read more
February 3, 2022

To Live a Life in Color, You May Have to Change Channels


Read more

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What’s Trending

03-20-23

New Report Reveals Surprising Insights from Internal Audit Executives


03-13-23

New IIA Report Is a Timely Benchmarking Resource for Internal Auditors


03-02-23

6 Things Audit Committee Members Often Won’t Say to Internal Audit


Read More

Archive

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009

Contact Us

PO Box 1441
New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170

+1-407-463-9389
rchambers@richardchambers.com

About AuditBeacon.com

AuditBeacon.com is a resource center for internal auditors and risk professionals from around the world. In addition to more than 500 blogs authored by Richard Chambers, the site includes links to news and insights on internal audit and other information that illuminates the value of this important profession. AuditBeacon.com is provided as a service by Richard F. Chambers and Associates, LLC.

Copyright © 2023 Richard F. Chambers & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books