logo-newlogo-newlogo-newlogo-new
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books
✕
  • Home
  • Chambers on Internal Audit
  • Internal Audit Communications
  • For Some Audit Reports: It’s Better Never Than Late

For Some Audit Reports: It’s Better Never Than Late

In the Face of Dire Cyber Threats – Internal Auditors Should Seize the Home Field Advantage
June 7, 2021
How Space Aliens Factored Into my Most Controversial Audit
June 16, 2021
June 14, 2021

I recently heard from an old acquaintance that I had worked with as an internal audit colleague years ago. He eventually moved on, and today holds C-suite assignment in a large company. He reached out to me because he had just received an internal audit report on his area of responsibilities that included a number of critical findings. He wasn’t contacting me about the substance of the report (some of with which he strongly disagreed). Instead, he was lamenting that the audit had taken three years to complete. Yes – 3 years! Yes – 36 months! Yes – 1,095 days! He knew my reaction before he even asked.

I realize that some of the delay in completing that internal audit was due to Covid-19. A lot of internal audit departments struggled with timely audits during the pandemic. However, as I shared in a blog last year, audit reports need to be even timelier during periods of extraordinary disruption. However, even if the internal audit department was shut down completely for the past 18 months, the audit still took far too long.

During his diatribe over the late audit report, my colleague pointed out several pitfalls from the audit that are true all too often when audits take too long. First, he observed that some of the audit results are out of date – portions of the audit addressed controls and operations pre-Covid that bear no resemblance to mid-2021. Second, he pointed out that some of the conditions could have been corrected far earlier if he had been given a copy or briefed on the draft findings. He concluded by observing that the final report was of virtually “no value” to the organization. I couldn’t disagree since the client is usually in the best position to make that assessment.

I realize that this is an extraordinary case. Very few internal audits ever drag on for more than a year. But far too many internal audits are not timely. Even an audit that takes three months (less than 10 percent of time that audit took) is really not timely in the eyes of many of internal audit’s stakeholders/clients. I once had a client who looked me straight in the eye and said, “I need your audit results in time to make a difference.” Late reports, he observed, were of little or no use. I felt that was a harsh assessment, but understood his point.

Over the years, I have come to agree with the great playwright George Bernard​ Shaw who once observed, “Better never than late.”​

I have been an evangelist about the need for timely audits for almost three decades. I have written countless blogs on the topic, and even dedicated three chapter in my book The Speed of Risk, on how internal audits can be timelier. There is much that can be done to achieve more efficiency in planning and conducting the audit, but it is often the process of writing and editing the final report that is the biggest culprit.

The iconic Larry Sawyer once observed that “few sources of friction within the audit department exceed that caused by the process of report writing.” Sawyer went on to correctly observe, “The most brilliant of analyses and the most productive of audit findings seem to be forgotten during the trauma of report writing.” In my view, these are some of the wisest comments Sawyer (or any other practitioner or academic) ever uttered about internal auditing.

After more than 45 years in the internal audit profession, I am not sure that we are any more proficient in publishing timely and well-written audit reports than we were the day I first “donned my internal audit spurs.” As Sawyer noted, the reasons for committing “reportable offenses” are many:

  • Internal auditors often lack fundamental writing and “storytelling” skills.
  • Draft reports often portray internal auditors as the heroes and management as the villains.
  • Supervisors (in large audit departments with multiple levels of supervisors) often rewrite or heavily edit the initial draft audit reports.
  • The emphasis on accuracy dwarfs the emphasis on timeliness.
  • Lack of coordination with management and a negative tone in the draft report creates friction that causes major push-back against the draft report.

The speed at which risks are emerging and destroying organizational value in the 2020s dictate that internal auditors should have zero tolerance for slow reporting processes. Delivering an outdated final report after like the case I cited earlier is not an option. That’s not even protecting organizational value, much less enhancing it.

So, once again, I want to share the advice for more timely report results? I boil it down to four critical strategies.

  1. Share the results as the audit unfolds. One of the most frustrating delays in finalizing an audit report is negotiating with the client on the wording and tone of our observations and conclusions. Clients often push back intensely against an audit report when they are seeing all of the results at once. Providing results incrementally can help mitigate the shock. Once the internal audit team gets to a point in the engagement when it is satisfied there is a reportable condition or something management needs to address, share the information right then with the client — either informally or through a written, interim update. Regular communication during the audit not only reduces the potential for friction at the end, but more importantly it enables timelier corrective measures.
  2. Reduce or even eliminate levels of review for draft results. The larger an internal audit department, the more levels of review reports often must undergo. Multiple levels of review within the internal audit department are often a major source of delays in audit reporting. Streamlining the review process and reducing the number of reviewers inevitably accelerates the reporting process.
  3. Collaborate to expedite. Bringing the audit team together with all of those who will edit or review the draft report for a single editing session also can reduce a report’s cycle time dramatically. This allows the internal audit team and the department’s upper-level supervisors to discuss the draft and propose changes without the endless back and forth of the usual editing process. I used this “team editing” approach with great success in internal audit departments I led in the past.
  4. Re-imagine reporting. This is the 21st century, yet our reports can look and feel as if we banged them out on a Selectric typewriter. We live in the era of tweets and text messages, yet we still write reports that look and feel like college term papers. Get creative with the objective of conveying the information as swiftly and concisely as possible. Yes, we must document the results of our audits, but a typical internal audit report goes far beyond conveying results. Streamline the report down to bare essentials, and measure performance on the timely impact the report has — not the number of words or findings contained within.

I could write on about the timeliness of internal audits, but that wouldn’t be a good use of our time. I hope some of my ideas are helpful as you ponder the future of your audit processes.

As always, I look forward to your thoughts.

Share

Related posts

January 2, 2023

Six Tips for Internal Auditors When Delivering “Bad News”


Read more
August 24, 2022

Internal Auditors Must Sometimes Break The Rules to Ask The “Right Questions”


Read more
July 11, 2022

Internal Audit and the Endangered Art of Tact and Diplomacy​​


Read more

2 Comments

  1. Norman Marks says:
    June 14, 2021 at 3:16 pm

    Richard, the most important change that should be made is in the emphasis on writing a report. It is far more valuable and effective to sit down with management and talk. A true back and forth discussion of not only the insights of the auditor but what the best actions or inactions are right for the business.

    Reply
  2. Alaba A. Awolaja says:
    June 19, 2021 at 1:15 pm

    My challenge about reviewing draft audit reports has been the first writer of the report. Most times, during the review process I asked questions about the areas of the field work that should support the audit observations, then no answers. Also, traditionally, internal auditors are always after management to extent that the reports will be rejected on arrival due to the style and criticism therein. Most times, a report of over twenty pages will be reduced to just about five pages because most of the observations cannot be substantiated.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What’s Trending

03-20-23

New Report Reveals Surprising Insights from Internal Audit Executives


03-13-23

New IIA Report Is a Timely Benchmarking Resource for Internal Auditors


03-02-23

6 Things Audit Committee Members Often Won’t Say to Internal Audit


Read More

Archive

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009

Contact Us

PO Box 1441
New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170

+1-407-463-9389
rchambers@richardchambers.com

About AuditBeacon.com

AuditBeacon.com is a resource center for internal auditors and risk professionals from around the world. In addition to more than 500 blogs authored by Richard Chambers, the site includes links to news and insights on internal audit and other information that illuminates the value of this important profession. AuditBeacon.com is provided as a service by Richard F. Chambers and Associates, LLC.

Copyright © 2023 Richard F. Chambers & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books