logo-newlogo-newlogo-newlogo-new
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books
✕
  • Home
  • Chambers on Internal Audit
  • Uncategorized
  • Fantasy Island: Lessons Learned From DraftKings and FanDuel

Fantasy Island: Lessons Learned From DraftKings and FanDuel

From Trusted Adviser to Double Agent: Are Regulators Trying to Redefine Internal Audit?
October 5, 2015
Leadership Lessons From an Audit Giant
October 19, 2015
October 12, 2015

Another week, another example of internal control failures hurting an organization and industry.

Details of the scandal engulfing the online fantasy sports company DraftKings should be common knowledge by now. A DraftKings employee admitted to the early release of data not generally available to the public and won US$350,000 on a rival site, FanDuel, that same week. The comparisons to insider trading quickly – and logically – followed.

It didn’t take long for critics to start asking why a major player in the largely unregulated, multibillion-dollar fantasy sports industry didn’t have stronger controls in place to restrict access to protected information or ban its employees from participating in fantasy games elsewhere. In the wake of the bad publicity, I couldn’t help but wonder: Are there no “lines of defense” in fantasy football? One thing is clear: In the absence of such controls, regulators are more likely to step in and impose their own rules.

The lesson from this latest corporate blunder should be crystal clear: A well-designed system of internal controls is fundamental to reducing business risks.

It is important to have an understanding of how the rapidly growing fantasy sports industry works to grasp the magnitude of the imbroglio and how it might have been avoided through sound internal controls.

The industry was born from amateur fantasy leagues, where players assemble teams populated with real athletes. Points are earned based on how the athletes perform in real life, and winners are determined based on whose fantasy team accumulates the most points.

DraftKings and FanDuel, as well as other companies in online fantasy leagues, set up games in which players pay entry fees to go up against opponents, sometimes numbering in the hundreds. Prize money for the biggest winners can swell to seven figures. Indeed, DraftKings and others can afford to offer generous payouts, because the industry is expected to collect about US$3.7 billion in entry fees in 2015.

So here we would seem to have the perfect recipe for trouble: Take an in-demand commodity, add a helping of proprietary and valuable data, mix in the opportunity for large financial gains, and add a dash of resistance to or ignorance of internal control processes. Voila! We have cooked up the scandal du jour.

It’s not my intent to make light of a serious situation, but the current DraftKings mess was totally predictable. While DraftKings and FanDuel announced permanent bans on employees participating in fantasy leagues within days of the scandal breaking, the damage had already been done to their brands and reputations.

To be sure, the fallout was fast and painful:

  • ESPN initially announced it would end DraftKings’ sponsorship of certain programming, and later said it would stop running its ads.
  • The New York attorney general’s office announced it was looking into whether employees of DraftKings and FanDuel had an unfair advantage.
  • A Kentucky man is seeking class-action status for a federal lawsuit that accuses DraftKings and FanDuel of negligence, fraud, and false advertising.

Should DraftKings executives be criticized for not anticipating such problems? Considering the industry is largely unregulated, has seen remarkably rapid growth, and handles huge sums of capital on a weekly basis, the answer is an unequivocal “yes.”

Beyond the obvious lesson in the benefits of having a well-designed internal control system, the DraftKings scandal indirectly provides yet another good example of the need for mandatory internal audit programs at publicly traded companies.

While DraftKings is not currently publicly traded, it is a textbook example of how limited or poorly designed int​ernal controls can quickly be overwhelmed by the pressures of rapid business success. One of the criticisms of mandatory internal audit programs is that start-ups lack the resources to support them. But without such an investment, organizations are at greater risk of making much costlier mistakes in the future.

It’s all about the old expression, “Pay me now, or pay me later.”

Share

Related posts

March 13, 2023

New IIA Report Is a Timely Benchmarking Resource for Internal Auditors


Read more
May 16, 2022

THE STAGGERING TOLL OF COVID RELIEF FRAUD: WHERE WERE THE THREE LINES?


Read more
February 3, 2022

To Live a Life in Color, You May Have to Change Channels


Read more

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What’s Trending

03-20-23

New Report Reveals Surprising Insights from Internal Audit Executives


03-13-23

New IIA Report Is a Timely Benchmarking Resource for Internal Auditors


03-02-23

6 Things Audit Committee Members Often Won’t Say to Internal Audit


Read More

Archive

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009

Contact Us

PO Box 1441
New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170

+1-407-463-9389
rchambers@richardchambers.com

About AuditBeacon.com

AuditBeacon.com is a resource center for internal auditors and risk professionals from around the world. In addition to more than 500 blogs authored by Richard Chambers, the site includes links to news and insights on internal audit and other information that illuminates the value of this important profession. AuditBeacon.com is provided as a service by Richard F. Chambers and Associates, LLC.

Copyright © 2023 Richard F. Chambers & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books