logo-newlogo-newlogo-newlogo-new
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books
✕
  • Home
  • Chambers on Internal Audit
  • Internal Auditing Reputation
  • Everybody Loves a Government Watchdog … Until It Barks

Everybody Loves a Government Watchdog … Until It Barks

IS A GENERATION GAP FUELING AN INTERNAL AUDIT TALENT CRISIS?
June 13, 2022
The First Half of 2022 Has Been Risk-Induced Bedlam
June 28, 2022
June 22, 2022

It’s not clear when the label of watchdog was first attached to government auditors, but it has become a frequently used term for these hard-working public servants over the decades.

In many jurisdictions around the world, a government auditor’s mission is to ferret out waste, abuse, and corruption in government, and there is generally glowing praise for these watchdogs. However, in far too many instances, when a government auditor has to report that there is inefficiency, ineffectiveness, fraud, waste, or mismanagement, suddenly not everyone is happy to have them around.

Indeed, the love affair with watchdogs at all levels of government, as well as their capable corporate counterparts, has not been without a few spats. Over the years, legitimate and timely work by government audit bodies has been stalled, disrupted, or otherwise maligned by targets of queries, their supporters, or others who fear getting caught up in those investigations or called out by audit reports.

Reactions by government officials vary when the watchdogs bark, including stonewalling investigations and spinning the facts in the media ahead of the release of findings. In some instances, the response is simply to try to muzzle the watchdog.

Over the years, I have not hesitated to stand up for these “guardians of public trust,” and to call out those who retaliate against them. The latest highly publicized case involves the former Baltimore (Maryland USA) School Board Chief Auditor. A recent article on the Internal Audit 360 website disclosed:

“What had typically been a routine vote to renew the contract of Baltimore School Board Chief Auditor Andrea Barr was anything but typical this time around. The school board effectively fired Barr, who had been the chief auditor for 36 years, when several members simply abstained from voting.

In a meeting last month, only six of the 12 members voted to retain her while the others abstained or recused themselves. It took seven votes to renew her contract. There was no public discussion by the school board before it took the vote and no statement on the reasoning for not renewing Barr’s contract.“

Anytime a CAE’s employment in the government is terminated, my antenna goes up. I accept that in some instances the terminations are warranted for ineffective performance or malfeasance. However, too often politically motivated retaliation is the root cause, and that doesn’t serve the public well at all. I do not know Ms. Barr, and I willingly admit that I do not have all the facts. But additional details reported by Internal Audit 360 and media outlets paint an all too familiar scenario in which retribution seems to be a factor:

“…critics of the move site actions by Barr that put the board in an unflattering light for her ouster. In 2019, the auditor complained about a hostile work environment created by two board members. In 2020, her office released an internal audit which showed school board members misspent taxpayer money and overspent its budget.

The most recent vote ousting her could be seen as a parting shot from a school board, since nearly all members are finishing their final terms and leaving the board. A consultant has described their operation as ‘dysfunctional.‘”

As noted above, I have weighed in on countless instances of retribution against government auditors by politicians over the years. In most cases, they willfully stand up and vote to oust the internal auditor. What makes the Baltimore School Board case even sadder is that many of the school board members didn’t even display the courage to vote against Ms. Barr. Instead, they abstained – apparently realizing she would be ousted without adequate votes to renew her contract. In fact, this is the only case I can recall where a government auditor was ousted by an elected body without a single vote cast to do so.

Accountability is vital to our system of government. If there was a basis for not renewing the Chief Auditor, then it should have been disclosed. I call on the incoming members of the Baltimore School Board to review the facts of this case and cast a proper vote on retention of the Chief Auditor. If that doesn’t happen, then Baltimore is yet another American City where oversight has gone to die.

Share

Related posts

February 20, 2023

The Perils of Internal Audit as ’Corporate Police’


Read more
December 19, 2022

Fines Against Internal Auditors Raise Serious Questions


Read more
October 31, 2022

Internal Auditors: Put Away Your Radar Guns (and focus on traffic safety)


Read more

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What’s Trending

03-20-23

New Report Reveals Surprising Insights from Internal Audit Executives


03-13-23

New IIA Report Is a Timely Benchmarking Resource for Internal Auditors


03-02-23

6 Things Audit Committee Members Often Won’t Say to Internal Audit


Read More

Archive

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009

Contact Us

PO Box 1441
New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170

+1-407-463-9389
rchambers@richardchambers.com

About AuditBeacon.com

AuditBeacon.com is a resource center for internal auditors and risk professionals from around the world. In addition to more than 500 blogs authored by Richard Chambers, the site includes links to news and insights on internal audit and other information that illuminates the value of this important profession. AuditBeacon.com is provided as a service by Richard F. Chambers and Associates, LLC.

Copyright © 2023 Richard F. Chambers & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books