The past three years have been both remarkable and challenging for internal auditors. We have demonstrated remarkable agility in swiftly refocusing our efforts to address emerging risks in the wake of the global financial crisis. While resources have been reduced commensurate with corporate downsizing, the glass is arguably very much “half full.” As we move into 2011 and beyond, however, it will become imperative to “fill the glass.” Many internal audit stakeholders are once again growing restless in terms of internal auditing’s knowledge of the business, efficiency, and overall “value proposition.”
In my last blog entry of 2010, I reiterated once again how much internal auditors have accomplished in the past two years. I closed my thoughts, however, by sounding a “note of caution.” I noted that “storm clouds” may be gathering on the horizon, and that internal auditing’s stakeholders seem to be signaling a concern that internal auditors are often failing to demonstrate enough value. I sense an increasing mood that internal auditors are not adapting fast enough to dynamic change in their organizations. I also sense that the heavy emphasis on assurance over financial controls has stifled internal auditors’ knowledge of their companies’ business/industry.
In November, I participated in the Ernst & Young (E&Y) webcast: “Can Your Internal Audit Function Really Enable Business Performance?” During the broadcast, a number of sobering statistics were revealed from a recent E&Y global survey of internal auditing’s stakeholders:
I also have noted similar trends in stakeholder views from my own observations and from other surveys. From my experience in this profession, I am not surprised that the stakeholders are getting restless. As I wrote in one of my first blog posts almost two years ago:
“The most common strategic mistake chief audit executives (CAEs) make is failing to maintain continuous alignment with the needs and expectations of their key stakeholders (typically the audit committee, chief executive officer (CEO), and chief financial officer (CFO) in the corporate sector). Once a gap emerges, it’s only a matter of time before the audit committee and senior management collaborate to change CAEs.”
Based on the noise I am starting to hear from stakeholders, I have identified five key priorities I am recommending to every CAE as 2011 gets underway:
I plan to elaborate on these key priorities in a series of upcoming blogs. In the meantime, I encourage you to share your thoughts on stakeholder expectations and effective strategies to identify and fill any gaps.