logo-newlogo-newlogo-newlogo-new
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books
✕
  • Home
  • Chambers on Internal Audit
  • Uncategorized
  • Corporate Mergers: Internal Audit’s Role in “Happily Ever After”

Corporate Mergers: Internal Audit’s Role in “Happily Ever After”

Presidential Election Outcome Not Likely to Lessen Risk Uncertainty
November 4, 2016
Talent Management Is Critical to Internal Audit’s Success
November 21, 2016
November 14, 2016

The challenges associated with mergers and acquisitions are myriad. Yet every year, hundreds of companies across the globe conclude the potential upsides of combining two successful organizations are worth the risks.

A number of technology companies currently are grabbing the merger spotlight — AT&T and Time Warner, Level 3 Communications and CenturyLink, and Yahoo! and Verizon. I find that corporate mergers such as these are like celebrity weddings — splashy, highly orchestrated, and sometimes doomed to failure before the participants reach the altar.

Mergers and acquisitions are notoriously difficult and often fail to live up to the hype. Yet, the lure of creating something greater than the sum of its parts often overshadows the risks and pitfalls. Corporate managers and boards keen to expand into burgeoning markets, strengthen weaknesses, or even quiet a competitor, view these options as viable business strategies. Yet, they are strategies fraught with risks – for the shareholders of the respective companies, current and would be lenders, and even the companies’ customers.

Given all of the risks, it is imperative for internal audit to play a significant role whenever an organization identifies a potential takeover target. Ideally, internal audit should be invited to participate at the beginning of the process. Having a seat at the table often enables the internal auditors to better understand the business and strategic considerations that went into a merger decision. Too often, however, it is brought in after the decision has been made to move forward.

There are well-established due diligence processes that should be followed during a merger to determine a target company’s true value, fiscal health, labor relationships, and more. When companies merge, they each bring differing views of governance, risk, and control, and internal audit provides assurance in these areas and others.

At a minimum, effective due diligence should provide a clear picture of the target company’s corporate structure, information systems, control environment, and reporting lines. An excellent resource on internal audit’s role in mergers is Mergers, Acquisitions, and Sales: How Internal Audit Adds Value and Effectiveness, available through The IIA’s bookstore.

The pending US$4.8 billion Yahoo! and Verizon merger can teach us something about the importance of thorough due diligence. Merger talks were well under way, including public pronouncements of the mega-deal, when Yahoo! revealed a cyber hack involving half a billion customer accounts that occurred in 2014. Is it possible the breech might have been uncovered as part of Verizon’s due diligence? We’ll never know the answer to that question, but we do know the consequences of not knowing. At least one high-profile industry analyst is warning the deal may now fall through. Short of that, a renegotiated deal might well occur.

We can’t move off this subject without discussing the impact of mergers and acquisitions on corporate culture.

I’ve noted before that my favorite definition of corporate culture is “how things get done around here.” When organizations marry two cultures, “how things get done around here” can quickly become murky. For example, upstart competitors, often the targets of mergers, may bring a more youthful, technology-driven, or aggressive ends-justify-the-means approach to business that clashes with or erodes the existing corporate culture.

Potential problem areas that should be on management’s and internal audit’s radar include leadership styles, decision-making processes, attitudes toward change, and even how success is defined or valued. The importance of getting culture right can’t be overstated. Indeed, the inability to successfully merge cultures was cited in a Bain CEO survey as one of the principle reasons mergers fail to meet goals for combined value. Culture’s impact on the success of mergers was ranked 7.45 on a scale of 10 in a survey of more than 130 U.S. executives conducted by Pritchett in 2010.

These two surveys suggest culture is on the merger agenda. Yet the Pritchett survey found just 4 percent of respondents report their organization includes culture questions in their due-diligence checklist. The survey also found just 5 percent of respondents’ companies perform a “culture gap analysis” or some other compatibility study to determine a culture fit.

Deloitte offers strong advice in its report, Cultural Issues in Mergers and Acquisitions and offers seven clear steps for assuring culture is examined and addressed. The list includes making culture a key part of change management, identifying who “owns” corporate culture and having them report to senior management, and examining the strengths and weaknesses of culture at both organizations.

As stakeholders increasingly turn to internal audit to assess culture, it should become routine for that service to extend to the due diligence process in mergers and acquisitions.

As always, I look forward to your comments.   ​

Share

Related posts

March 13, 2023

New IIA Report Is a Timely Benchmarking Resource for Internal Auditors


Read more
May 16, 2022

THE STAGGERING TOLL OF COVID RELIEF FRAUD: WHERE WERE THE THREE LINES?


Read more
February 3, 2022

To Live a Life in Color, You May Have to Change Channels


Read more

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What’s Trending

03-20-23

New Report Reveals Surprising Insights from Internal Audit Executives


03-13-23

New IIA Report Is a Timely Benchmarking Resource for Internal Auditors


03-02-23

6 Things Audit Committee Members Often Won’t Say to Internal Audit


Read More

Archive

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009

Contact Us

PO Box 1441
New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170

+1-407-463-9389
rchambers@richardchambers.com

About AuditBeacon.com

AuditBeacon.com is a resource center for internal auditors and risk professionals from around the world. In addition to more than 500 blogs authored by Richard Chambers, the site includes links to news and insights on internal audit and other information that illuminates the value of this important profession. AuditBeacon.com is provided as a service by Richard F. Chambers and Associates, LLC.

Copyright © 2023 Richard F. Chambers & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books