logo-newlogo-newlogo-newlogo-new
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books
✕
  • Home
  • Chambers on Internal Audit
  • Uncategorized
  • Clawbacks on Executive Pay: Where Does Internal Audit Fit In?

Clawbacks on Executive Pay: Where Does Internal Audit Fit In?

When It Comes to Risk-based Auditing, Don’t Let the Tail Wag the Dog
February 16, 2015
Contributing Your Voice to Internal Auditing’s Body of Knowledge
March 2, 2015
February 23, 2015

A recent report in the Wall Street Journal once again brings into sharp relief just how the repercussions of a crisis can play out. The Feb. 17 article, “U.S. Regulators Revive Work on Incentive-pay Rules” (subscription required) outlines how regulators are considering “clawback” provisions in compensation packages for certain employees of Wall Street firms. The idea is to require organizations to structure compensation so that executives would have to return bonuses if they are found to have committed an egregious error or fraud during their tenure.

The 2008 financial crisis had a significant impact on internal audit’s scope of work and influence. Indeed, the 2010 U.S. Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act continues to impact internal audit plans across multiple industries. Now we have the potential for additional fallout as federal regulators consider rules to curb compensation packages that might encourage excessive risk-taking.

According to the Journal article, a number of financial institutions modified their compensation packages in the wake of the nation’s financial meltdown. Some voluntarily defer bonuses over a number of years and some, including at least one major bank, have recouped money from executives who engaged in misconduct. The article goes on to say that investors now are pushing for disclosure when “clawback” policies are applied.

From my experience, regulation is typically the byproduct of failure. Regulators gain entry into areas such as executive compensation when management, boards, and (even) internal auditors fail to carry out their responsibilities effectively. You rarely have a situation in which a new regulation is proposed and adopted when there isn’t at least the perception of failure along the way.

In this case, the road to regulation was paved, in part, by executive compensation models that, either by design or happenstance, focused on the short term. It should seem obvious that, if compensation is based on what gets done only in the here and now, then longer-term consequences are not always a factor in risk-taking or decision-making processes.

Failure to effectively manage can lead to new regulations that, in turn, create additional compliance burdens for organizations — in this case, banks, broker-dealers, investment advisers, and other financial institutions.

There are other considerations, as well. When clawback provisions are triggered, they don’t just damage the credibility of the executives involved. They also have the potential of impacting morale within the organization and making it very difficult for the company to recover with the current set of executives still in place. There’s fallout even if the clawback involves former executives, because you then have current executives wondering if they, too, will eventually have to surrender bonuses.

So where does internal audit fall in all this? This is such an important area that The IIA has published a Practice Guide for its members on Auditing Executive Compensation and Benefits. As the Practice Guide notes, “Internal auditors have an important role in providing assurance that appropriate and effective controls are in place around executive compensation and benefits (ECB) programs.” The Practice Guide explores several risks that executive compensation and benefits present to companies, including employment market risks, compliance risks, financial reporting risks, reputation risks, and operating risks.

The Practice Guide is an excellent resource for internal auditors who may be wading into the potentially treacherous waters of executive compensation audits for the first time. The Practice Guide includes discussion of an ECB audit approach, audit considerations, and some valuable guidance on developing a program for an ECB audit. The Practice Guide acknowledges that ECB is a “sensitive” area for internal audit coverage. It also notes that, while there may be obstacles to obtaining information for an ECB audit, “internal audit needs to proceed in accordance with its charter.”

Auditing ECB may create an awkward situation for internal auditors who suddenly find themselves evaluating how their administrative bosses are paid. Understandably, some may be reluctant to point out when a compensation package is not structured in the best interest of the organization. But these situations afford internal auditors the opportunity to show true leadership. It is our obligation to say what has to be said, and we must be courageous in meeting those obligations.

I’d like to hear your views and about your experiences on executive compensation.

Share

Related posts

March 13, 2023

New IIA Report Is a Timely Benchmarking Resource for Internal Auditors


Read more
May 16, 2022

THE STAGGERING TOLL OF COVID RELIEF FRAUD: WHERE WERE THE THREE LINES?


Read more
February 3, 2022

To Live a Life in Color, You May Have to Change Channels


Read more

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What’s Trending

03-20-23

New Report Reveals Surprising Insights from Internal Audit Executives


03-13-23

New IIA Report Is a Timely Benchmarking Resource for Internal Auditors


03-02-23

6 Things Audit Committee Members Often Won’t Say to Internal Audit


Read More

Archive

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009

Contact Us

PO Box 1441
New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170

+1-407-463-9389
rchambers@richardchambers.com

About AuditBeacon.com

AuditBeacon.com is a resource center for internal auditors and risk professionals from around the world. In addition to more than 500 blogs authored by Richard Chambers, the site includes links to news and insights on internal audit and other information that illuminates the value of this important profession. AuditBeacon.com is provided as a service by Richard F. Chambers and Associates, LLC.

Copyright © 2023 Richard F. Chambers & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books