logo-newlogo-newlogo-newlogo-new
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books
✕
  • Home
  • Chambers on Internal Audit
  • Uncategorized
  • A Bad Month for Internal Audit Just Got a Little Better

A Bad Month for Internal Audit Just Got a Little Better

Fines Against Internal Auditors Raise Serious Questions
December 19, 2022
A Dozen Who Made a Difference:
December 28, 2022
December 23, 2022

Man hiding under laptop

Earlier this week, I posted a blog about recent fines levied against two former Wells Fargo internal auditors. The blog was a call to action for internal audit executives and governments around the world. I called on CAEs to consider in the factors that led to the Wells Fargo fines when setting and reviewing their own quality assurance and improvement programs. I also called on governments to legislate safeguards and protections for internal auditors who find they “are handcuffed when it comes to executing their roles free of restrictions and interference.” I noted that if governments are determined “to call “balls and strikes” on how internal audit executes its role, then they should provide safeguards that will enable internal auditors to swing the bat when needed.”

My blog on the Wells Fargo fines resonated with internal auditors around the world – generating almost 100,000 impressions on LinkedIn alone. But despite the intended message of the blog, there is no hiding the “black eyes” that such stories inflict. Respected compliance author Matt Kelly asserted in an article earlier this month that Wells Fargo’s former CAE had “ample evidence that Wells Fargo’s sales practices were a nine-alarm fire, yet he didn’t take sufficiently strong action to tell the board that the building was burning down.” Let’s be honest, bad publicity like that is never good for any profession – especially one that prides itself of being “guardians of trust.”

As if the Wells Fargo news wasn’t bad enough for the profession, last week the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), issued a proposed confirmation standard for external auditors. Normally, such news wouldn’t be of significant consequence for internal auditors. However, in its infinite wisdom, The PCAOB included a provision that “internal auditor should not select the items to be confirmed, send confirmation requests, or receive confirmation responses.” Frankly, that wasn’t the bad news. As my readers know, I have long discouraged the use of internal auditors to do administrative leg work for external auditors. So that didn’t bother me too much.

The PCAOB wasn’t content to preclude internal audit support of the external auditors. Instead, they included the following rationale: “Involving internal auditors or other company employees in these activities would create a risk that information exchanged between the auditor and the confirming party is intercepted and altered. Accordingly, under the new proposed standard, using direct assistance from internal auditors for these activities would not be allowed.” So, in essence, the PCAOB believes internal auditors can’t provide this kind of administrative support because they can’t be trusted! Give me a break. A skeptic might point out that there has been more publicity about PCAOB staff who have leaked information than internal auditors.

The PCAOB comments came less than two weeks after the Wells Fargo news, and further cast internal audit in a bad light. These unrelated pronouncements by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and PCAOB have had the unfortunate consequences of casting internal audit as less than trustworthy.

The double whammy of December’s bad news promised to end the year on a bad note. Then just when we needed it most The IIA weighed in on the PCAOB’s proposal. President and CEO, Anthony Pugliese, expressed “deep concern over the potential precedent the PCAOB’s proposed standard may set regarding the work of internal auditors. The internal audit profession is grounded in providing audit committees with objective assurance, independent from management, in accordance with internationally recognized internal auditing standards. The PCAOB’s proposed standard could have the unintended consequence of implying that internal auditors would intentionally ‘intercept’ and ‘alter’ information. Like external auditors, internal auditors have an obligation to exercise due care in the handling of all information.” 

As The IIA went on to note in its press release: “Internal auditors are responsible for providing audit committees with objective assurance, independent from management, on matters related to risk management, internal controls, and corporate governance, in accordance with the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing. Because internal auditors and external auditors have the same independent reporting relationship to the Audit Committee, it is common for external auditors to rely on work performed by internal auditors and/or for internal auditors to directly assist external auditors in the performance of certain duties.” 

The IIA added that it is presently examining the full impact of The PCAOB’s proposal and intends to submit a formal response during the exposure process in 2023.

So, what lessons should internal auditors take away from the news this month? First, we must remember that we are not immune from scrutiny and skepticism from others – including government oversight agencies. Second, we must remember that we live in glass houses, and are prime targets for those who throw stones. Finally, we must remember that in order for The IIA and other advocates to mount an effective defense on our behalf, we must “walk our talk.” We must champion ethical conduct in our organizations and hold ourselves to the same standards that we hold others.

I welcome your thoughts on this timely conversation.

Share

Related posts

January 31, 2023

Recent Advice on Hiring Internal Auditor’s You Can ‘Trust’ Is Misdirected


Read more
January 24, 2023

Do Performance Bonuses Impair Internal Auditors’ Independence and Objectivity?


Read more
January 16, 2023

Are Internal Auditors to Blame When Boards Are in the Dark?


Read more

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What’s Trending

01-31-23

Recent Advice on Hiring Internal Auditor’s You Can ‘Trust’ Is Misdirected


01-24-23

Do Performance Bonuses Impair Internal Auditors’ Independence and Objectivity?


01-16-23

Are Internal Auditors to Blame When Boards Are in the Dark?


Read More

Archive

  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009

Contact Us

PO Box 1441
New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170

+1-407-463-9389
rchambers@richardchambers.com

About AuditBeacon.com

AuditBeacon.com is a resource center for internal auditors and risk professionals from around the world. In addition to more than 500 blogs authored by Richard Chambers, the site includes links to news and insights on internal audit and other information that illuminates the value of this important profession. AuditBeacon.com is provided as a service by Richard F. Chambers and Associates, LLC.

Copyright © 2023 Richard F. Chambers & Associates. All Rights Reserved.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Audit Trail Academy
  • Advisory Services
  • Books